Your Top Five Cyber Risks in Five Clicks with the Free Cyber Risk Analysis

FREE RISK ANALYSIS
Request Demo

Practice vs Process Maturity: Strengthening Your Cyber Compliance & Risk Program

down-arrow

Information security maturity has never been more important. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the catalyzation of digital transformation and the ripple effects on businesses ensuring a strong cybersecurity posture and risk management program is essential for the new year. Too often, organizations will turn to technology investments to help enhance their security, however, as software development and technology has become increasingly capable, we are seeing that there is no way to use technology to protect against human error. Regulations are beginning to reflect this realization; with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) being a landmark standard that incorporates the business process maturity model (BPMM) and practice maturity model when gauging the maturity level of a Department of Defense contractor’s security controls and programs.


Accounting for People and Process as well as Technology

As we move into a new year, organizations are still working to support the new enterprise applications that the pandemic ushered in. Specifically, security and risk teams have been working to update strategic business policies and procedures to support the rapid rise of remote work (a trend on the horizon but much like other trends accelerated by the pandemic, something no one saw becoming reality this fast). Furthermore, as digital transformation has distributed risk decision-makers across the organization, security leaders have been forced to take a risk-based approach to their business process management where historically compliance was a primary driver.

Practice vs Process Maturity

While we have seen standards like CMMC explicitly discuss the concepts of process and practice maturity, assessing and increasing the level of maturity on a practice and security process areas is possible using frameworks such as the NIST CSF Implementation Tiers. 

At its core, improving security maturity and transitioning from ad hoc/reactive security to proactive/optimizing security is the end goal through the incident response maturity model. Regardless of the security maturity model an organization chooses, the management and process maturity levels are essential to understand where you stand.

Watch the Webinar

 

You may also like

Prioritizing Cybersecurity ...
on January 28, 2025

There is an immediate need for organizations to quickly implement or mature their cyber risk practices, and even more so as the reality of a new era of remote work and other ...

Alison Furneaux
Beyond the CISO: Leveraging a ...
on January 27, 2025

The Strategic Importance of a Deputy CISO The role of a Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) is constantly evolving, often expanding to encompass responsibilities beyond the ...

Top Cybersecurity Predictions for ...
on January 21, 2025

Cybersecurity in 2025: Key Predictions As we approach 2025, the cybersecurity landscape is poised for significant shifts. Experts predict a move towards more practical AI ...

A Pocket Guide to Cyber Risk ...
on January 16, 2025

Cybersecurity is no longer just about firewalls and antivirus software. In today's data-driven world, effectively managing cybersecurity risk requires quantification: turning ...

Choosing the Right Cyber Risk ...
on December 27, 2024

Selecting a cyber risk management solution is a critical decision for any organization. The process requires careful consideration of your needs, how a platform can meet them, and ...

How to Streamline Your ...
on December 24, 2024

Many industry regulations require or promote cybersecurity risk assessments to bolster incident response, but what is a cybersecurity risk assessment? For example, cyber risk ...

Alison Furneaux