Your Top Five Cyber Risks in Five Clicks with the Free Cyber Risk Analysis

FREE RISK ANALYSIS
Request Demo

Practice vs Process Maturity: Strengthening Your Cyber Compliance & Risk Program

down-arrow

Information security maturity has never been more important. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the catalyzation of digital transformation and the ripple effects on businesses ensuring a strong cybersecurity posture and risk management program is essential for the new year. Too often, organizations will turn to technology investments to help enhance their security, however, as software development and technology has become increasingly capable, we are seeing that there is no way to use technology to protect against human error. Regulations are beginning to reflect this realization; with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) being a landmark standard that incorporates the business process maturity model (BPMM) and practice maturity model when gauging the maturity level of a Department of Defense contractor’s security controls and programs.


Accounting for People and Process as well as Technology

As we move into a new year, organizations are still working to support the new enterprise applications that the pandemic ushered in. Specifically, security and risk teams have been working to update strategic business policies and procedures to support the rapid rise of remote work (a trend on the horizon but much like other trends accelerated by the pandemic, something no one saw becoming reality this fast). Furthermore, as digital transformation has distributed risk decision-makers across the organization, security leaders have been forced to take a risk-based approach to their business process management where historically compliance was a primary driver.

Practice vs Process Maturity

While we have seen standards like CMMC explicitly discuss the concepts of process and practice maturity, assessing and increasing the level of maturity on a practice and security process areas is possible using frameworks such as the NIST CSF Implementation Tiers. 

At its core, improving security maturity and transitioning from ad hoc/reactive security to proactive/optimizing security is the end goal through the incident response maturity model. Regardless of the security maturity model an organization chooses, the management and process maturity levels are essential to understand where you stand.

Watch the Webinar

 

You may also like

How to Streamline Your ...
on December 24, 2024

Many industry regulations require or promote cybersecurity risk assessments to bolster incident response, but what is a cybersecurity risk assessment? For example, cyber risk ...

Alison Furneaux
CISO Reporting Structure ...
on December 23, 2024

The Changing Landscape of CISO Reporting The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) role has evolved dramatically in recent years. Traditionally reporting to the Chief ...

How to Leverage the FAIR Model ...
on December 19, 2024

In light of the Colonial Pipeline cyberattack, measuring risk is on everyone’s minds. However, quantifying risk is often not easy. So many factors go into determining and ...

Kyndall Elliott
How to Effectively Communicate Top ...
on December 9, 2024

Effective cybersecurity reporting is more important than ever for CISOs, CIOs, and other security leaders in today's complex threat landscape. Reporting isn’t just about sharing ...

November Product Update
on November 27, 2024

The CyberSaint team has been working hard to deliver the latest updates to streamline and improve our customers’ user experience and address their top-of-mind challenges. We’re ...

Putting the “R” back in GRC - ...
on December 5, 2024

Cyber GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) tools help organizations manage and streamline their cybersecurity, risk management, and compliance processes. These tools integrate ...